PDA

View Full Version : White House Memo Proves Bush Lied


mylanta
03-28-2006, 07:51 AM
[/URL]» [URL="http://www.democrats.com/blog"]Blogs (http://www.democrats.com/) » Bob Fertik's blog (http://www.democrats.com/blog/6) "White House Memo" Drives a Stake into the Heart of White House Lies

Submitted by Bob Fertik on March 28, 2006 - 1:19am.Decision (http://www.democrats.com/taxonomy/term/168)
Something remarkable happened Monday: the Corporate Media finally got sick of Bush's endless lies about Iraq, and started to tell the truth.
The immediate cause was a front-page New York Times story (http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/9779) about the "White House Memo," a 5-page report on the White House meeting between George Bush and Tony Blair on January 31, 2003 - seven weeks before the invasion of Iraq.
At that time, millions of us were protesting around the world. We all knew Bush wanted war - that's why we were protesting! - but Bush insisted publicly that he did not, and the Corporate Media let him get away with his lies.
The "White House Memo" proves that Bush was lying - saying one thing in public while saying the opposite in private. In private, he told Tony Blair that war was inevitable, and that it didn't matter if WMD's were found or if the U.N. adopted a resolution actually authorizing the invasion.
In fact, Bush was so desperate for war that he proposed painting a U.S. spy plane with U.N. colors and flying it over Iraq to provoke an attack. But even if Saddam refused the bait, Bush told Blair the bombing would begin on March 10. Bush wanted war, no matter what.
The Times article caused White House reporters to challenge Scott McClellan at the morning press gaggle (http://www.first-draft.com//modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=5612). And in the evening, the "White House Memo" was featured on two key cable shows - Hardball with Chris Matthews and Countdown with Keith Olbermann (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/03/27.html#a7687).
Why is the truth finally breaking through? Because of us - all of us.
We marched by the millions before the war and predicted misery and horror, and we were right. When the Downing Street Memos proved Bush planned war all along, we created our own media (http://afterdowningstreet.org (http://afterdowningstreet.org/)) to tell the story the Corporate Media refused to tell. When we got tired of being ignored, we commissioned our own polls and began a grassroots impeachment movement (http://impeachpac.org (http://impeachpac.org/)) to tell Congress and the media that we would ultimately hold Bush accountable for his lies.
And now we have reached a turning point in our "long march" for Truth. Everyone in the world knows in their heart that Bush lied. Soon everyone will say it out loud: Bush Lied. When millions of Americans say those two simple words - and the media finally joins us - Bush's reign of fear will come to a crashing halt.
That day cannot come soon enough for the people of America and the world.
Let's seize the moment we've demanded for five long years. Call your favorite talk shows. Write letters to your favorite newspapers. Call and write your Representatives and Senators. Our message is simple and clear: Bush Lied so he must be Impeached.
The Bush Era must end so peace and justice can finally begin. To honor the thousands who have died for Bush's lies, we cannot settle for anything less. Now is the time for truth.

RAK
03-28-2006, 11:48 PM
Proves what, Rich? That news of importance is still being brought across the Atlantic by HMS Titanic? This story appeared at least a month ago over in Britain and has traveled the whole world, and yet only yesterday it appears in US media. Old Tweety over at MSNBC was acting like he just discovered Amelia Earhart. And in typical Hardball fashion, he managed to once again misquote history by comparing it to the "Phantom Punch" Mohammed Ali laid on George Forman(?) ( One clue, Chris; Sonny Liston!). This is why I have no respect for these guys. Thet keep whining about political Bloggers and how they can't be trusted to deliver
"real news". They spent weeks sitting on this memo , supposedly because they were waiting for verification. They could have just checked with BBC or Gaurdian UK! Britain has some of the most severe Libel laws in the world! No editor in Britain (especially after the horrid and biased Hutton Report) is going to risk their career or their paper's reputation and print a totally erronious document! The greatest media in the World and we're always the last to know; Here we spell stupid AMERICAN.

RAK

mylanta
03-29-2006, 08:42 AM
Well while there is a lot of truth to what you say, we don't need a replay of Dan rather either. That stupid incident did Bush a lot of good in the last election.

Terry Hanushek
03-29-2006, 12:15 PM
Ron

Proves what, Rich? That news of importance is still being brought across the Atlantic by HMS Titanic?
:D

They spent weeks sitting on this memo , supposedly because they were waiting for verification.
Three words: Remember Dan Rather:eek:

Terry

RAK
03-29-2006, 05:41 PM
Yeah, good point. But as to the Rather case, one word; laziness. That and the fact it was an old story and just fed into that "swift Boat" nonsense. But that plays right into what I'm saying. The media wastes their time with stupid stories like Bush's National Guard attendence record (I got no problem with it; After all, there were no Viet Cong attacks in Texas on his watch:)) while ignoring and downplaying the issues of his record.
It's more likely they sat on this story so Bush could time it to come out at the same time as his chief of staff shuffle. This way he could minimize the damage. Nah, I don't buy the whole "Rather scenario". They weren't pillars of courage before that. This is corporate media laying down in bed with the CEO President. Stop making excuses for them!


RAK