PDA

View Full Version : The 25 Worst Tech Products of All Time


RAK
05-27-2006, 08:58 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20060526/tc_pcworld/125772;_ylt=ApT9pHq_6UeEr00npyDjdfqs0NUE;_ylu=X3oD MTA3ODdxdHBhBHNlYwM5NjQ-

An the Winner ISSSS:horn: :first:


1. America Online (1989-2006)

How do we loathe AOL? Let us count the ways. Since America Online emerged from the belly of a BBS called Quantum "PC-Link" in 1989, users have suffered through awful software, inaccessible dial-up numbers, rapacious marketing, in-your-face advertising, questionable billing practices, inexcusably poor customer service, and enough spam to last a lifetime. And all the while, AOL remained more expensive than its major competitors. This lethal combination earned the world's biggest ISP the top spot on our list of bottom feeders.

AOL succeeded initially by targeting newbies, using brute-force marketing techniques. In the 90s you couldn't open a magazine (PC World included) or your mailbox without an AOL disk falling out of it. This carpet-bombing technique yielded big numbers: At its peak, AOL claimed 34 million subscribers worldwide, though it never revealed how many were just using up their free hours.

Once AOL had you in its clutches, escaping was notoriously difficult. Several states sued the service, claiming that it continued to bill customers after they had requested cancellation of their subscriptions. In August 2005, AOL paid a $1.25 million fine to the state of New York and agreed to change its cancellation policies--but the agreement covered only people in New York.

Ultimately the Net itself--which AOL subscribers were finally able to access in 1995-- made the service's shortcomings painfully obvious. Prior to that, though AOL offered plenty of its own online content, it walled off the greater Internet. Once people realized what content was available elsewhere on the Net, they started wondering why they were paying AOL. And as America moved to broadband, many left their sluggish AOL accounts behind. AOL is now busy rebranding itself as a content provider, not an access service.

Though America Online has shown some improvement lately--with better browsers and e-mail tools, fewer obnoxious ads, scads of broadband content, and innovative features such as parental controls--it has never overcome the stigma of being the online service for people who don't know any better.

The rest of the 25 Turkeys:


The Complete List of Losers
#1 America Online (1989-2006)
#2 RealNetworks RealPlayer (1999)
#3 Syncronys SoftRAM (1995)
#4 Microsoft Windows Millennium (2000)
#5 Sony BMG Music CDs (2005)
#6 Disney The Lion King CD-ROM (1994)
#7 Microsoft Bob (1995)
#8 Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 (2001)
#9 Pressplay and Musicnet (2002)
#10 dBASE IV (1988)
#11 Priceline Groceries and Gas (2000)
#12 PointCast (1996)
#13IBM PCjr. (1984)
#14 Gateway 2000 10th Anniversary PC (1995)
#15 Iomega Zip Drive (1998)
#16 Comet Cursor (1997)
#17 Apple Macintosh Portable (1989)
#18 IBM Deskstar 75GXP (2000) (That's right, RIch; The Deathstars finally get their recognition:))
#19 OQO Model 1 (2004)
#20 CueCat (2000)
#21 Eyetop Wearable DVD Player (2004)
#22 Apple Pippin @World (1996)
#23 Free PCs (1999)
#24 DigiScents iSmell (2001)
#25 Sharp RD3D Notebook (2004)
(Dis)Honorable Mention
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,125772,pg,7,00.asp

kelly
05-28-2006, 09:22 AM
4) What's the problem with WinME? I never had any issue with it? Maybe the problem is that it didn't offer the improvements expected by the users.

15) I liked Zip disks. For their time, they were pretty good. However, I think the competition was better, can't remember the company, but they used 135MB drives. The media was one side of a hard drive platter. They used platters were one side didn't make the grade for other products. Great recycling usage. Super drives never caught on.

Other than that, I have to agree ...
- tony d

Pi rules
05-28-2006, 05:29 PM
Tony, there are many reasons ME is one of the worst OSes. Incompatiblity, instability, sloppy code...

I don't think IE 6 deserves to be on that list, or at least that high, but I certainly agree with 1. AOL and 2. RealNetworks

RAK
05-28-2006, 11:37 PM
I couldn't copy the whole article; each nomination has a description of why it was picked. I'm also a little dissapointed that threads from this category do not seem to appear on the opening page. There is always plenty to argue about what is really bad and just plain annoying. The Iomega Zip was chosen because of a class-action suit involving faulty drives, and as for ME, I think it mostly depended on the installation. I first ran it as an upgrade and had nothing but problems. I dumped it and went back to 98. I tried it again as a clean install on another machine and it ran fairly well for a while. Comet Curser was not so much a product as an early form of spyware. It would try all kinds of tricks to get you to download that crap. And who can forget Cue Cat? Well, I guess I can.:)

Terry Hanushek
05-29-2006, 02:03 PM
Tony

15) I liked Zip disks. For their time, they were pretty good. However, I think the competition was better, can't remember the company, but they used 135MB drives. The media was one side of a hard drive platter. They used platters were one side didn't make the grade for other products. Great recycling usage. Super drives never caught on.
I'm with you on the Zip drive. For many years (between 1.44 floppies and the advent of USB thumb drives), the Zip disk was the leading removable storage media. For several years, all of my computers - office, home and laptop - had Zip drives and all of my documents and files resided on Zip disks. During this time, I never had a drive or a media failure.

Terry

athomsfere
06-16-2006, 01:19 AM
The Deathstars made it on the list, but not any of the Maxtor drives?

What, thats wrong, site discredited... ;)

Seriously, I'll take the Hitachi's over any Maxtor... horrible drives.

mylanta
06-17-2006, 11:20 PM
Hard to choose between the two. The Deathstar was a superior drive until Ibm ran into controller problems they chose to walk away from. I always thought maxtor was crap from day 1.

athomsfere
06-18-2006, 11:40 PM
Lets see if Seagate can save the name!

mylanta
06-19-2006, 08:40 AM
Lets see if Seagate can save the name!
And let's hope the reverse isn't true as after the Quantum merger, Maxtor went all to Hell. If Quantum taught Maxtor how to make a crappy drive, will maxtor do the same "service" for Seagate?

Seth
06-19-2006, 04:02 PM
4) What's the problem with WinME? I never had any issue with it? Maybe the problem is that it didn't offer the improvements expected by the users.

In fairness to Microsoft, with all the crap people install on their computer, coupled with the lack of proper maintenance...it's a wonder that ANY operating system runs at all!

Windows ME has become the operating system of choice to be picked on. All I can say, is that I ran it heavily on two computers for over a year with no problems at all.

mylanta
06-19-2006, 04:16 PM
In fairness to Microsoft, with all the crap people install on their computer, coupled with the lack of proper maintenance...it's a wonder that ANY operating system runs at all!

Windows ME has become the operating system of choice to be picked on. All I can say, is that I ran it heavily on two computers for over a year with no problems at all.

Yeah and Me was a huge improvement on 98...

athomsfere
06-19-2006, 04:42 PM
I actually felt ME was 98, a few facelifts and that was about it.
That was my main bone with it. I did like the jump to XP, and through the life of it, it has become a pretty decent OS, just in time to be replaced of course.

I am anxious for my first go at Vista (Hopefully by the end of July, fingers crossed)

mylanta
06-19-2006, 06:27 PM
I actually felt ME was 98, a few facelifts and that was about it.
That was my main bone with it. I did like the jump to XP, and through the life of it, it has become a pretty decent OS, just in time to be replaced of course.

I am anxious for my first go at Vista (Hopefully by the end of July, fingers crossed)

Good liuck I am waiting till I take some gross thing in trade I can afford to kill to try it.

Terry Hanushek
06-19-2006, 08:53 PM
Rich

Yeah and Me was a huge improvement on 98...
I'm not so sure ... Al and I are still evaluating it.:decision: :argue: :decision:

:D

Terry

mylanta
06-19-2006, 09:26 PM
Rich


I'm not so sure ... Al and I are still evaluating it.:decision: :argue: :decision:

:D

Terry

Fraid you are about to be alone in this Terry!