Tortanick
01-26-2007, 02:37 PM
Read all about it here (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/26/ecis_hello_vista/)
I can't believe that the specifications for OOXML requires that implementations replicate a Microsoft bug that dictates that 1900 is a leap year, which in fact it isn't.
I can't believe that the specifications for OOXML requires that implementations replicate a Microsoft bug that dictates that 1900 is a leap year, which in fact it isn't.